It is expected that the tax law for vehicles and boats will reflect the public opinions collected.

More than half of the public's opinion is to reduce the tax burden. This indeed reflects the attitude of most people in the face of new tax burdens. It also reflects that the tax burden has brought pressure on people's lives. With such a large number of concentrated public opinions, the draft taxation law for vehicles and ships should be reflected in the next legislative process.

Yesterday, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress passed the website of the National People's Congress of China and announced the public's solicitation of opinions on the "Law of the Vehicle and Boat Tax (Draft)". In the process of soliciting opinions, China National People's Congress Network received a total of 87,229 comments submitted by 22,832 netizens, of which: 35,779 articles in favor of the draft administrative code to rise to the law, accounting for 36.77%; requiring amendments to the draft, reducing the tax burden 53,137 of them accounted for 54.62%; 8379 were opposed to the formulation of tax laws for vehicles, accounting for 8.61%. Another letter from the masses is 40.

Opening the door and asking for opinions from the public is an improvement in China’s rule of law in recent years. The solicitation and publication of the "draft" public opinion itself is also implementing this legislative concept and procedure. Because, relative to the relevant ministries, local governments, experts, social organizations and enterprises, the public is more sensitive to the taxation leverage of the vehicle and boat tax.

The overall situation of the opinions solicited was briefly analyzed. More than 30% of the public agreed that the draft “upgrades administrative regulations into law”. This justifies the rational attitude of the people. People do not oppose the legislation on the taxation of vehicles and boats. The key is how to ensure the scientific and fairness of the law. .

Since the "Drafts and Vehicles Tax Law (Draft)" entered the legislative process, the social controversy has been the greatest, and the public is most concerned that the expulsion of emissions will generally increase the burden on the people. The people are concerned that they will eventually become disguised tax increases.

The draft was not less criticized by the members of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress during the deliberation of the last Standing Committee of the National People's Congress. Wen Fujiang, a member of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, frankly stated that the legislation “do not always want to save money from the pockets of ordinary people” but consider how to reduce taxes for the people. It should be said that this statement represents the voice of the people and is the mainstream opinion of public opinion at that time.

This time, the results of the solicitation opinions announced by the National People's Congress also showed that 53,137 articles requiring amendments to the draft and reducing the tax burden accounted for 54.62%. Among them, 7695 opinions put forward the purpose of legislating the travel tax, arguing that the tax cannot bear too many economic functions, failing to use the name of energy conservation and emission reduction, taxing on the basis of legislation, and increasing the burden on the owner; 7,066 comments require lowering or Flatten the tax burden on passenger cars below 2.0L.

More than half of the public's opinion is to reduce the tax burden. This indeed reflects the attitude of most people in the face of new tax burdens. It also reflects that the tax burden has brought pressure on people's lives. With so many and concentrated public opinions, the "Draft Law for Vehicles and Boats (Draft)" should be reflected in the next legislative process.

The purpose of the legislation is nothing more than for the benefit of the people. The process of legislation is also a process of interaction with the people. Earlier, there were already many such precedents in our legislative process. According to reports, in 2005, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress held the first legislative hearing to hear the opinions of representatives of various parties on a tax threshold and eventually raised the threshold by 100 yuan. In the course of the formulation of the labor contract law, the highest legislative body Positively responded to nearly 200,000 legislative opinions put forward by various sectors of society, drastically revised the draft law, and provided laborers with stronger legal protection.

We are looking forward to the deliberation and introduction of the "Draft Law on Vehicles and Vehicles", which will ultimately respect public opinion and reflect public opinion. Taxes on vehicles and boats can have more reasonable institutional arrangements. In the end, they should not increase the burden on the people.